Trump's monument grab sparks legal battle, Adddis Ababa runs out of space, Tel Aviv's White City

    by Best of the Week
    Wednesday, 6 December 2017 12:45 GMT

A supporter of Salvador Nasralla, presidential candidate for the Opposition Alliance Against the Dictatorship, is pictured during a clash with riot police as they wait for official presidential election results in Tegucigalpa, Honduras, November 30, 2017. REUTERS/Edgard Garrido

Discover all this week's top land and property rights stories from across the web

This week US president Donald Trump used his executive powers to make unprecedented cuts to 2 million acres of land at two national monunemt sites in Utah.

The The Bears Ears monument will lose 85 percent of its total area and the Grand Staircase-Escalante will be reduced by 45 percent as protections against development and agriculture will be removed.

Announcing the decision in Salt Lake City, Trump said the move would restore the land to citizens and also hinted at the economic benefits of developing the area.

But, as Brian Resnick explains for Vox, the president is moving into legally uncharted territory:

"Five Native American tribes — the Navajo Nation, Hopi, Ute Mountain Ute Tribe, Ute Indian, and Pueblo of Zuni — have joined in a lawsuit against the Trump administration, charging that the president of the United States has no power to decrease the size of national monuments like Bears Ears."

10 environmental groups have brought a similar case relating to Grand Staircase-Escalante.

Reductions to national monuments have been made before, by Woodrow Wilson and Franklin D Roosevelt, but not to this scale, and neither were challenged in court.

The cases will hinge on the 1906 Antiquities Act, which grants the president powers to preserve historic or pre-historic sites, but does not mention the removal of these protections. Resnick writes:

"The result of the expected legal challenges will have far-reaching consequences. They’ll clarify the degree to which a president can undo conservation efforts ... National monument designations are meant to ensure consistent protection for public lands. If courts favor Trump, then those protections could become fleeting."

NEWS

New Zealand examines Matt Lauer’s ranch purchase after his firing

'We'll see the battle lines': Trump faced by Native American alliance over Bears Ears

Fortescue to continue Pilbara land rights battle

More UK children homeless or in temporary housing than during crash crisis

India among deadliest countries for journalists, land, environment rights defenders: Amnesty

Environmental lawyers seek legal rights for the natural world

Sol Bellear honoured for his life fighting for Aboriginal rights

Thailand floods: Villagers frustrated over government inaction

US sees huge surge in number of homeless people on city streets

Veteran lawyer urges Hong Kong government not to rush through land title registration law

European Parliament takes a stand on indigenous rights in Latin America

FEATURES

Indigenous people, guardians of threatened forests in Brazil

'Addis has run out of space': Ethiopia's radical redesign

Zimbabwe’s villagers hope for an end To Grace Mugabe’s land grab

What happens when people in state housing cannot pay the rent?

Ornament is crime: The White City of Tel Aviv

Follow that stork! How animals move through cities – mapped

COMMENT

Land management and land records in India

Spike Lee has a gentrification problem

Finally, the suburbs might have a starring role in solving London’s housing crisis

Sign up for our weekly newsletter